A response to the article 2010 – The Death of Gaming

I don’t know about you, but I’m excited.  No, it’s not the new season of 24 – though OMG.  I’m talking about the gaming industry in 2010, and how, I believe, it is on the crest of a new wave of video gaming.

Now, this is an opinion piece, and I’ll admit my homework amounts to nothing more than being plugged into the gaming media 18/7 – I work part-time –  but I’m educated enough, and gamed enough, to know when something big is coming.

Let’s get down to it, shall we?  Motion control and 3-D (the abbreviation of ‘3D’, is dependent on where you look – the hyphenated version seems to relate specifically to certain television technologies allowing the domestic consumption of the format), the most significant advances in interactive entertainment – let’s call it Input – in the last ten years.  Forget chasing after the Magic Dragon of Photorealism, it’s a mirage; instead, look at the Nintendo Wii, at what that product has done to people’s perception of gaming.

Before this generation, in which I will include the Wii, though its hardware is largely (excepting the Wiimote) last generation, videogames were not something you’d share with your girlfriend/mother/grandma/sister.*

*Ok, yes, there are always going to be exceptions to this rule, but please don’t feel the need to remind me of who you are.  We’re all special, after all.

Today, a close proximity to Wii Fit enhances your social appeal.  It’s officially ‘in’, a ‘fad’, and a topic of conversation that doesn’t end in mild embarrassment.  All this, when I can still remember cultivating an attachment to Star Wars: Rogue Squadron on the Gamecube (Nintendo’s previous console); a game, about which, my girlfriend and I are unlikely to develop a bond; a game that has nothing but unhealthy connotations, from serious sci-fi addiction to the sofa-bound control scheme.

And it’s not at all to do with appealing to women.  Heck no.  That would be a short-sighted conclusion, considering the large amount of female gamers there are and always have been.  No, it’s the uncanny ability of an oblong of plastic to encourage entire generations to treat videogames as a viable casual pastime.  But why?

Nintendo's Wii - appealing to women, attractive to men

First of all, the Wiimote has changed people’s perceptions of how people play games.  The image of an overweight, spotty teenager, slouched over a control pad has been replaced by an attractive 20-something woman in revealing sports gear, working up a sweat playing virtual volleyball.  It’s genius, and it’s not just for perverts either.  Granddad has the promise of a good, old fashioned game of golf in the safety of his own home.  Where are the Grand Theft Auto hoodlums now?  Challenging Auntie Madge to another round of Wii bowling, that’s where.  Motion control has brought the family unit into gaming.  How many of us played Wii with our nearest and dearest this Christmas?

This might well constitute a revolution in itself, however, I did not set out to write about the Wii’s success.  By itself, Nintendo’s motion control gimmick – as some call it – can’t redefine the videogames we play today, simply because of their console’s hardware limitations.  Don’t see that as an insult.  Understand that, in terms of computing power, the Wii is about seven years old.  It can’t handle the cutting edge game engines that power most of the HD consoles’ (PS3 and 360) AAA games.  If you’re a Wii owner holding out for a sudden revelation in pixel pushing prowess akin to Uncharted 2: Among Thieves, please consider this your wake up call: it’s never going to happen.  And here in lies the problem.

The games favoured by the so called hardcore of gaming (at least, console hardcore – a separate species from their PC cousins), are all about graphical and networking innovation.  Textures, lighting, and the number of players in an online battle take supremacy over ingenious interfacing.  In fact, many PS3/360 will tell you they like the simplicity of an old-fashioned control pad – there’s a pleasant levelling factor in control pads, in that, no matter how capable you are at physical activity, twiddling your thumbs is relatively straightforward (though there must be a few of us who, sadly, may have issues with this control method as well).  And, of course, some of us will continue to swear by the keyboard and mouse as if they were rare, high-levelled loot in a game of Diablo.

But this adherence to a convention of controllers, like the Wii’s inferior power, has been counter-productive to the evolution of gaming.  Computer games have reached an impasse.  And while graphics have been improved and online gaming has been brought into the living room (by PS3/360), and whilst the concept of motion control has been proved popular (by the Wii), gamers have yet to see the benefit of these technologies working in tandem.

That’s where 2010 comes in.  Sony’s Motion Controller and Microsoft’s Project Natal have been scheduled to release this autumn/fall, and, with them, the next generation of motion controlled games.  Yes, Sony and Microsoft will have their own equivalents of Wii Sports Resort and Wii Fit; it would idiotic of them not too, given the potential for such titles to win over the casual crowd, but both companies are well aware that they have an established base of hardcore gamers.  I predict that, before the year is out, we will see hardcore games, FPSs, RTSs and RPGs, adopting this technology in novel and surprising ways.

This can be a sensitive topic for many gamers.  Ever since the PS3/360 motion controllers were announced early last year, a large amount of comment/talkback time has been dedicated to the theory that Sony and Microsoft will abandon their core audience in favour of our grandmas.  This paranoia is symptomatic of a generation of gamers that believe the golden age of gaming is over and that we – those of us who can still remember playing the original Half-Life - have been left to fight over the scraps thrown down to us from the Sony/Microsoft table, in the form of platform exclusives released about every six months.  But the truth is that the golden age of gaming has not yet arrived, and, if there is one, it might well begin in 2010.

Microsoft’s Natal, the Sony ‘wand’ (a non-official name), and the advances in home 3-D technology, represent an opportunity for developers to reacquaint themselves with one of the fundamental concepts of Virtual Reality: immersion.  After all, how we interface with our virtual entertainment is about a lot more than overcoming the inconvenience of not being in direct physical contact with the worlds we play in.

A good interface should be invisible (as small and neat as possible), intuitive and natural, causing no sense of disorientation between the real and the virtual.  Such an interface allows for a sense of immersion in the entertainment.  Both the 360 controller and the Dual Shock 3 do a decent job at being invisible, and, if the controls are laid out well, intuitive, but they are not natural.  They do not mimic or recreate natural motion, which is exactly why Wii tennis, though it bares little visual resemblance to the real game, definitely feels more like playing tennis.

However, if Natal and the ‘wand’ can match or better the accuracy and speed of the Wiimote, then it is possible to imagine 360 and PS3 games with much more visceral, much more natural and much more immersive gameplay.  The tech demos for both devices have hinted at mind-boggling possibilities: speech recognition in character interaction, melee combat that actually involves wielding a virtual sword and shield with your own hands, as well as speed and precision when moving, placing and selecting objects in the virtual world.

There will be those that say, ‘We’ve had the Wii for years now, and no one has succeeded in making a single hardcore game that plays better with motion controls, than on consoles or the PC.’

Well, that may be the case.  But remember, the Wii is too slow to deliver the definitive experience in any of today’s games.  No matter what happens with the next Zelda, it will still not be as advanced as TES: Oblivion.  The Wii wasn’t designed to be a machine for ambitious blockbusters.  The deepest experiences on the console are Nintendo’s trademark IPs (Super Mario Galaxy and The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess), and, while each makes liberal use of the Wiimote, motion control has not been at the heart of any of these games (apart, perhaps, for Metroid Prime 3: Corruption – the best implementation of a motion controller in a FPS-Platformer to date.)  Let’s face it; we shouldn’t be looking to the Wii for experiences like Demon’s Souls or Bioshock.  Long may it continue to be the no.1 console for bowling titles.

It is reasonable, however, to expect these advanced experiences on the 360 and PS3. And, in this case, I think motion control gaming is going where it belongs – to the cutting edge.

Honestly, I will not hesitate to get my hands on the PS3 ‘wand’, when the inevitable sword and sorcery epic is released – be it Hack and Slash or RPG.  And I’m thrilled at the prospect of what the ‘wand’ can do for online shooters.  In my mind, if it really works at 60fps, it may elevate the biggest disadvantage about FPS gaming on a console – the fact that no analogue stick on earth will ever require as much precision and skill as a mouse.  Who knows, we could see the end of ‘Aim Assist.’  Consoles could become the place for competitive online gaming.  Similarly, RTSs may finally become playable with the precision of a fast pointer.

How to talk about Natal?  It’s hard to make any judgments before we’ve seen what the technology can do, but I’ve got a few ideas.  For the hardcore gamer, there are a number of benefits motion-tracking can offer, though they do not resemble what we’ve come to expect from the controller based systems (Wii, PS3).  The first is that of speech recognition in RPG games or adventure games, where interacting with NPCs is a large part of the gameplay.  If you’ve seen the ‘Milo Demo’, introduced by Peter Molyneux at E3 2009, you will know what I’m talking about here.  Sure, the demo is a set-up – there’s a script.  But if Microsoft can actually come close to the vision of that demo then we’ll have something special on our hands – or not on our hands, as the case may be.

One has to wonder, however, about the biggest issue with Natal, and how it can be resolved.  You can’t move your character in the virtual world: it’s a tracking system, not a control system.  Is there a solution?  Yes.  Will it be used?  Almost certainly.  What is it?  Simple, the 360 Wireless Controller isn’t going anywhere.  For 50% of all Natal games, 90% of all hardcore games, I am prepared to bet that you will control most of your in-game movement the same way you’ve always done it, with the analogue sticks and the ABXY buttons.  And, while this is not a bad thing, it reveals the limitation of Natal’s technology for the hardcore gamer.

What remains is something that’s been around on the PC for a few years, and something that the PS3’s Eye Toy can also do:  head tracking.  Good news is that this is a damn cool feature which is excellent for action gaming.  Basically, the camera tracks your head movements and makes them correspond to where you’re looking in-game – aiming can then be handled separately by the analogue stick.  This means you can look in one direction, while pointing your gun in another.  It’s tactically realistic, immersive, and very, very useful.  Of course, with the advanced nature of Natal, you might also get the chance to duck and lean and jump, if you can be bothered, and don’t mind looking like an ass in front of your friends.

In conclusion, I must mention 3-D.  We won’t all have it in our homes this year, but there’s a fair chance that most of us will in 3-5 years.  Its benefits for gaming are self-explanatory, but it’s safe to say it can only enhance the immersion we have in our videogames.  Combined, as it must be, with motion technology it could literally add another dimension to the experience.

So, with 3-D TVs, motion trackers and motion controllers becoming commonplace in our living rooms, the notion of ‘Full Immersion VR’, for everyone is easier to imagine than ever before.  Are you ready to embrace these technologies, and be the first to score a headshot with a virtual gun you had to physically aim?  Or will you rail against them, clamouring for the good-old-days when games were simple, and when GTA’s hookers didn’t meet your eye in defiance when you beat them to death with a baseball bat?

One thing’s for sure: we live in exciting times for interactive entertainment.  The games of the future are being born today.

With 2010 still shiny and brand new, I wanted to address something close to my heart: a disturbing trend with action properties that I’ve noticed in recent gaming. With Bayonetta receiving rave reviews in all the mainstream media, Darksiders garnering very positive scores across the board, Dante’s Inferno lurking somewhere in the near future and, of course, the shadow of God Of War 3 looming over them all, I am beginning to wonder where gaming is headed in 2010.

Now don’t get me wrong, I can see the appeal of games like Bayonetta and Dante’s Inferno. And, sure, I’ll even enjoy them for a few days, but, after a while, I know I’ll find them underwhelming and lacking in depth and substance.  Apart from a minority of  modern games, such as Demon’s Souls (2009) and Heavy Rain (both PS3 exclusives), I am certain that we are witnessing the beginning of the breakdown of hardcore ‘real’, gaming.

Here’s why.

Do you remember in November 2006 when the Ninendo Wii was released?  Everyone was convinced that motion controls were the future, and that hardcore games for adults would soon make proper use of the features. All well and good, but now, looking back on the last few years since that supposed game-changer, and all I can see is pointless, brainless, mind-numbing casual gaming crap.

Gaming’s latest revolution has given us an industry devoted to stuffing our TV’s with bite-size, substance-less party games with no creative merit whatsoever. And why do this?  MONEY. Yes, there’s money to be had in gaming: in Wii balance boards, in Dance Dance Revolution mats and in Blockbuster Movie tie-ins.  There’s money to be made in endless sequels such as Halo: ODST (A series Reaching for yet more cash), Final Fantasy XIII or Gran Turismo 5 with ‘incredible ideas’, such as playing as a different character in a dubiously different story or slight upgrade in graphics. But most ly, there’s money to be made in so called, ‘casual’ gaming, and everyone wants a piece of the pie.  Project Natal and the PS3 motion control just confirm this fact – pointless pieces of technology designed to cash in on the never ending Wii craze.

‘But whats the problem with that?’ I hear you say, ‘I like being able to sit down with my gran and my little niece and my son and my dad and my seven mates all in one room for a nice Hello-Kitty-Halo-Online-MW2-MotionPlus-Wii-fitness-balance-boarding session. Gaming is for the people! Gaming is for everyone!’

The problem with that comment, is that it devalues the art of gaming (for there is art in videogames), making it little more than staring brainlessly at flashing lights on a screen.  This brings me back to 2010’s action gaming extravaganza. Nowadays, publishers only seem interested in pushing out the next big action game as quickly as possible with no concern for innovation, inventiveness, or for hardcore gamers (Bayonetta, Dante’s Inferno, GOW3: DMC and the original GOW did that already).

Action games are great, but where’s the depth?  Where’s the intriguing plotline that DOESN’T have your character die in a nuclear explosion? Where’s the gameplay that encourages skill rather than encourages running around with a knife annoying people? Where’s the combat system that doesn’t reward button mashers? Where are the countless other things that hardcore gamers like me wish they could find in gaming today?

The answer?  Publishers don’t care about you, the hardcore gamer.  They care about the bottom line, they care about money, they care about casual gaming. They don’t want to make the innovative games or the risky games, they don’t want to take things in new directions.  It’s safer to take an old mechanic and an old premise and dress it up in new clothes so it looks original.  So they’ll re-use and re-hash and water-down original IPs until they can be spoon fed to the masses, each year, for £60, or $60 or €60 a slurp (Don’t get me started on the price of games).

Where’s my evidence to back up this outrageous claim that may bring the entire internet fanboy population down on my head?  It’s all around you.  Pick up one of many games released recently, such as Bayonetta, Darksiders, Halo ODST, MW2 or a host of others and tell me that it isn’t a derivative piece of crap devoid of ideas and innovation. I’m tired of reading about the ‘next big thing’, which is actually the same as something that was around several years ago, but the mainstream media have forgotten.

I want to old days back, where I would spend hours in games stores marveling at the imagination on display. Now, all I have to do is fight my way through hordes of screaming kids and confused parents just so that I can come home and be called a ‘fag’ by a 13-year-old on XBOX live.

2010 – The Death of Real Gaming.  It’s closer that you think.

EDIT: I added a response to many of the readers comments on N4G, viewable here.